VS Code Sweeper — Verdicts

← home · 38 swept users · 19184 issues reviewed · generated 2026-08-31 16:43 UTC

Verdict distribution

What the sweep concluded about the 19184 reviewed issues — the verdict mix alone, independent of whether anyone acted on it (that's the adoption page).

propose close · 2592 (14%) needs info · 2462 (13%) keep open (incl. route to area) · 14130 (74%)

Close proposals by reason, × the 2nd review

Colored = the verify lanes' blinded second review of the proposal (they cover duplicate and implemented-on-main). The lanes only review open proposals — darker gray closed before a 2nd review could happen; pale is open and awaiting the next verify sweep. Other reasons stay pale: no lane covers them yet.

confirmed disputed unverifiable closed before 2nd review open, not yet reviewed
727 (28%)
811 (31%)
292 (11%)
246 (9%)
157 (6%)
133 (5%)
117 (5%)
57 (2%)
29 (1%)
21 (1%)
2 (0%)

Closure outcome per swept user

What the review concluded about each issue's fate. Route-to-area counts as keep-open — it improves triage but the issue stays open.

propose close needs info keep open (incl. route to area)
1398
1373
1204
1098
928
836
829
775
753
745
718
705
637
604
581
574
537
488
432
385
355
347
340
325
318
307
212
211
203
185
174
167
164
142
138
123
123
107

Agent-fixable share of issues that stay open

Of the issues the review keeps open, how many carry a reviewed fix spec an agent can implement — the sweeper-fix skill's pool. Dark green = value score above the agent-fix pool's median — the same demand × severity score that ranks the top pages.

high-value agent-fixable agent-fixable stays open, needs a human
148 of 1027 (14%)
182 of 1043 (17%)
99 of 868 (11%)
12 of 533 (2%)
76 of 597 (13%)
80 of 517 (15%)
77 of 650 (12%)
74 of 655 (11%)
79 of 597 (13%)
92 of 550 (17%)
94 of 619 (15%)
53 of 613 (9%)
51 of 466 (11%)
79 of 491 (16%)
82 of 489 (17%)
63 of 371 (17%)
41 of 463 (9%)
25 of 165 (15%)
31 of 287 (11%)
34 of 314 (11%)
60 of 291 (21%)
53 of 284 (19%)
6 of 261 (2%)
42 of 294 (14%)
42 of 299 (14%)
23 of 230 (10%)
13 of 158 (8%)
14 of 161 (9%)
15 of 154 (10%)
9 of 169 (5%)
9 of 133 (7%)
16 of 139 (12%)
32 of 152 (21%)
22 of 113 (19%)
7 of 125 (6%)
30 of 114 (26%)
9 of 108 (8%)
8 of 84 (10%)

Close reasons per swept user

Each user's close proposals, stacked by reason. The mix reflects what lands in each inbox — issue composition, not reviewer or sweeper quality (e.g. platform churn produces duplicate families; a proxy-owned inbox collects extension-caused noise). Implemented-on-main leads every bar so it can be compared across users off the shared left edge; globally-rare reasons fold into "other". Since 2026-08-09 reasons come from the verdict's structured closeReason field (label-independent — an as-designed close now shows as as-designed even in a repo with no such label); records predating the field derive their reason from the proposed label and fix provenance, so historical mixes may shift slightly.

implemented on main duplicate as-designed question out-of-scope not-reproducible caused-by-extension other
188
131
186
189
134
169
96
72
82
94
64
53
103
51
63
120
39
174
64
36
30
28
40
23
15
38
20
22
25
11
22
14
4
17
7
7
9
14
Exact counts per user
UserClose proposalsimplemented on mainduplicateas-designedquestionout-of-scopenot-reproduciblecaused-by-extensionother
lszomoru18847 (25%)73 (39%)20 (11%)17 (9%)5 (3%)7 (4%)1 (1%)18 (10%)
hediet13135 (27%)40 (31%)26 (20%)12 (9%)4 (3%)1 (1%)7 (5%)6 (5%)
justschen18677 (41%)68 (37%)15 (8%)7 (4%)5 (3%)6 (3%)6 (3%)2 (1%)
deepak155618928 (15%)94 (50%)11 (6%)14 (7%)17 (9%)19 (10%)3 (2%)3 (2%)
roblourens13442 (31%)42 (31%)11 (8%)13 (10%)7 (5%)6 (4%)8 (6%)5 (4%)
lramos1516939 (23%)34 (20%)18 (11%)37 (22%)12 (7%)8 (5%)4 (2%)17 (10%)
sandy0819637 (39%)22 (23%)3 (3%)7 (7%)8 (8%)4 (4%)8 (8%)7 (7%)
connor43127223 (32%)26 (36%)8 (11%)1 (1%)7 (10%)6 (8%)1 (1%)
TylerLeonhardt8222 (27%)30 (37%)5 (6%)10 (12%)4 (5%)7 (9%)4 (5%)
anthonykim19421 (22%)26 (28%)12 (13%)9 (10%)7 (7%)5 (5%)9 (10%)5 (5%)
meganrogge6438 (59%)11 (17%)7 (11%)1 (2%)6 (9%)1 (2%)
aeschli5322 (42%)15 (28%)1 (2%)5 (9%)3 (6%)1 (2%)1 (2%)5 (9%)
joshspicer10323 (22%)22 (21%)8 (8%)4 (4%)16 (16%)6 (6%)22 (21%)2 (2%)
osortega5117 (33%)20 (39%)5 (10%)2 (4%)3 (6%)1 (2%)3 (6%)
mjbvz6329 (46%)16 (25%)11 (17%)1 (2%)4 (6%)2 (3%)
alexdima12039 (33%)25 (21%)32 (27%)1 (1%)2 (2%)7 (6%)11 (9%)3 (3%)
benibenj399 (23%)10 (26%)13 (33%)1 (3%)3 (8%)3 (8%)
chrmarti17425 (14%)28 (16%)4 (2%)65 (37%)8 (5%)28 (16%)10 (6%)6 (3%)
ulugbekna649 (14%)20 (31%)17 (27%)5 (8%)3 (5%)6 (9%)4 (6%)
DonJayamanne3616 (44%)9 (25%)2 (6%)1 (3%)3 (8%)2 (6%)1 (3%)2 (6%)
Yoyokrazy3011 (37%)7 (23%)2 (7%)5 (17%)3 (10%)2 (7%)
rzhao271289 (32%)7 (25%)8 (29%)1 (4%)3 (11%)
mrleemurray4014 (35%)16 (40%)6 (15%)2 (5%)2 (5%)
aiday-mar2313 (57%)5 (22%)3 (13%)1 (4%)1 (4%)
Copilot158 (53%)3 (20%)4 (27%)
dmitrivMS3810 (26%)14 (37%)6 (16%)3 (8%)1 (3%)2 (5%)1 (3%)1 (3%)
vijayupadya207 (35%)7 (35%)2 (10%)1 (5%)2 (10%)1 (5%)
pwang347222 (9%)11 (50%)4 (18%)2 (9%)1 (5%)1 (5%)1 (5%)
vritant24256 (24%)14 (56%)3 (12%)1 (4%)1 (4%)
alexr00111 (9%)3 (27%)1 (9%)1 (9%)2 (18%)2 (18%)1 (9%)
hawkticehurst223 (14%)10 (45%)4 (18%)2 (9%)3 (14%)
bhavyaus142 (14%)4 (29%)4 (29%)3 (21%)1 (7%)
amunger42 (50%)2 (50%)
sbatten176 (35%)4 (24%)3 (18%)2 (12%)2 (12%)
jo-oikawa73 (43%)1 (14%)1 (14%)1 (14%)1 (14%)
jrieken71 (14%)4 (57%)1 (14%)1 (14%)
kycutler93 (33%)2 (22%)2 (22%)1 (11%)1 (11%)
benvillalobos141 (7%)4 (29%)2 (14%)3 (21%)1 (7%)3 (21%)
⚑ Feedback